Protocols & Standards

What role do protocols and standards play in agent interoperability?

Protocols and standards define how agents, tools, and systems communicate, exchange context, and establish trust.

In agentic environments, interoperability depends on shared expectations around identity, intent, data exchange, and authorization.

Without standards, agent interactions become brittle, unsafe, and tightly coupled to specific implementations.

What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) defines how context is shared between models, agents, and tools.

It standardizes how inputs, intermediate state, memory, and outputs are packaged and passed across components.

MCP enables agents to operate coherently across tools and environments without leaking unnecessary data or losing execution context.

Learn more

Why is MCP important for agent safety and interoperability?

Agents often rely on external tools, retrieval systems, or other agents to complete tasks.

MCP ensures that only the required context is shared, reducing the risk of overexposure, data leakage, or unintended instruction transfer.

By constraining context exchange, MCP helps limit blast radius while enabling collaboration.

Learn more

What is the Agent Communication Protocol (ACP)?

The Agent Communication Protocol (ACP) defines how agents communicate with each other.

It standardizes message formats, intent signaling, task delegation, and response handling between agents.

ACP enables agents built by different teams or vendors to interact without relying on custom, point-to-point integrations.

How does ACP support secure agent-to-agent interaction?

ACP allows agent interactions to be explicit, structured, and verifiable.

Messages can be validated, scoped, and governed by policy before actions are taken.

This prevents implicit trust and ensures that delegated tasks do not exceed approved authority.

How do protocols like MCP and ACP differ from traditional APIs?

Traditional APIs are designed for deterministic request–response interactions between applications.

MCP and ACP are designed for context-aware, multi-step, and adaptive agent interactions.

They account for memory, intent, delegation, and evolving state—concepts that standard APIs were not built to handle alone.

What is the role of API gateways in agentic architectures?

API gateways act as control points between agents and backend services. They validate identity, enforce authorization, apply rate limits, and inspect requests before allowing access.

In agentic systems, gateways ensure that agent actions remain governed even when tools and services are shared.

How do API gateways complement agent protocols?

While MCP and ACP define how agents communicate, API gateways define what agents are allowed to access.

Gateways enforce policy, isolation, and security at the infrastructure boundary.

Together, protocols and gateways ensure interoperability does not come at the cost of control.

Why are open standards critical for agent ecosystems?

Agent ecosystems are inherently multi-vendor and multi-platform. Open standards prevent lock-in, enable portability, and allow agents to collaborate across organizational boundaries.

Standards ensure that interoperability scales as agent ecosystems grow.

How does identity fit into agent protocols and standards?

Identity provides the trust layer for protocols like MCP and ACP.

It ensures that every agent interaction is authenticated, authorized, and attributable.

Without identity, protocols enable communication—but not safe communication.

How do modern IAM platforms support protocol-driven agent architectures?

Modern IAM platforms provide token-based identity, policy enforcement, and authorization controls that integrate with agent protocols and gateways.

This allows protocol-driven interactions to remain scoped, observable, and auditable.

LoginRadius supports standards-based identity and API security, enabling organizations to prepare for interoperable, agent-driven architectures.

How do we prevent agents from creating “Backdoor Accounts”?

Preventing backdoor accounts requires centralized identity creation controls. Agents must not be allowed to create identities or credentials autonomously. All account creation must go through approved provisioning workflows with policy checks, role constraints, and audit logging. Agent permissions should explicitly exclude identity creation unless tightly scoped and reviewed.

How do we isolate misbehaving tenants in a multi-tenant agent system?

Misbehaving tenants are isolated through strict tenant-level identity, data, and execution boundaries. Each tenant must have separate identity scopes, data access controls, and agent execution contexts. Runtime throttling, tenant-level kill switches, and isolation at the policy and infrastructure layers prevent one tenant’s agents from impacting others.

How do we prevent “Token Stuffing” against agent endpoints?

Token stuffing is prevented by using short-lived, scoped tokens bound to agent identity, context, and purpose. Agent endpoints should validate token audience, scope, expiration, and usage patterns on every request. Rate limiting, anomaly detection, and rejecting replayed or cross-context tokens further reduce attack effectiveness.

How do we ensure “non-repudiation” of agent actions?

Non-repudiation is ensured by cryptographically binding every action to a specific agent identity and recording it in immutable audit logs. Actions must be signed, timestamped, and logged with context (agent ID, scope, intent, and outcome). This guarantees actions cannot be denied or altered after execution.

Book A Demo